A Royal Flop II Kings 3
A Royal Flop
II Kings 3
Jehoram ascended Ahab’s throne
and did nothing to stop the downward trajectory his ancestor accelerated. Ahab reigned poorly over a doomed
dynasty. Jehoram perpetuated a losing
legacy. He did let go of some of Ahab’s idols
but “clung” (covenant word used for sticking to the agreement) to a predecessor’s
lifeless gods. The One True and Living
God wants us to cling to Him. He especially
expects this clinginess of kings who rule over God’s people. Instead, these Israelite kings were glued to the
pagan gods of the surrounding culture.
There is an obvious royal tone
to II Kings 3. The word king is used 22 times. The verbal form is used another three
times. We might expect royal power to be
the theme of this chapter. Instead the
theme is royal weakness. Even a
coalition of three kings can’t accomplish its simple goal of reining in one
rebel king.
King Jehoram faced rebellion
from the outset of his reign. Kings
accumulate wealth and influence through expansionist policies. Growing in strength often requires
domination. Subjugated rulers pay
tribute to conquering kings. Moab served
Israel for many years. But under the
leadership of Jehoram Moab rebelled and Jehoram lost valuable tribute in the
form of sheep and sheep products. As is
a ruler’s prerogative he organized the nation to answer the rebellion
militarily. He also brought together a
royal coalition. He solicited the help
of Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, and the king of Edom who controlled the path to
Moab.
Three kings set out to teach the
ruler of Moab a lesson. Instead of
glorious victory they encounter drought.
A dehydrated soldier is ineffective as are thirsty beasts. Water shortage is devastating to an active
army and one important way God teaches us about control. Specifically, who is in control. Especially of life and death. When faced with this loss of control due to an
utter inability to produce water the king of Israel senses the antagonism of
the Lord. Is his defeatist attitude a
symptom of his idolatry? He’s sure God
is against him and he’s correct, and it’s because of the trust factor. He trusts in gods other than the Lord who has
often proven He can supply water for thirsty people.
Jehoshaphat has the right
question. Where can we find a prophet of
the Lord? Ironically, a nameless servant
of Israel’s king has the right answer.
And that answer is Elisha. God’s
spokesperson. Steward of the Word of the
Lord. Provider of life’s
necessities.
Jehoram gets no love from
Elisha. He’s told to consult false prophets seeing that’s his preference. Jehoshphat gets a nod from Elisha. His pact with Israel and Edom doesn’t please
the Lord but he does have the sense to consult the true God in adversity. The king of Edom seems irrelevant.
God, in His mercy promises water
and assures a victory. Pools of water
are provided that appear without rain.
The troops and the beasts drink and prepare for battle. When Moab hears enemy footsteps the king responds by preparing for
battle. He and his soldiers rise in the
morning. They’re at the border. Looking out as the sun shines brightly on the
waters they badly misinterpret what they see.
They mistakenly believe that the members of the royal coalition have
turned on one another. Because the water
God provided looks like blood Moab confidently marches forward thinking the
troops will conduct a mopping-up action. This poor judgment leads to an initial
defeat. Further disaster ensues when he
falsely judges Edom to be the weak link.
He attacks and is driven back. In
desperation The king of Moab proves to be radicalized by offering his oldest
son and heir on the wall as a sacrifice.
The drastic action creates an
atmosphere of fear and everyone returns home.
The ending is sad, confusing and
so unsatisfying. But at the same time
strangely enlightening. Here are kings
in action accomplishing little. All that
power on display and who wins? No
one. Who proves to be wise? A slave and a prophet. Who proves to be resourceful? A slave and a prophet. Who proves to have an answer? A slave and a prophet. Good thing we’ve entrusted our lives to a
king willing to become a slave for our sakes.
A king who satisfies our thirst.
A king who can be trusted. A king
who rules and will rule forever with real power and authority we can depend
on.
Comments
Post a Comment